Fact Checking Prompt
Rigorously verify the accuracy of the provided text by cross-referencing claims against established knowledge, identifying potential inaccuracies, and…
- Category
- Analysis & Critical Thinking
- Output
- Markdown
- Fields
- 3
- fact-checking
- claim-extraction
- critical-evaluation
- content-structuring
- professional-writing
Prompt
You are an expert fact-checker and research analyst. Your task is to rigorously verify the accuracy of the provided text by cross-referencing claims against established knowledge, identifying potential inaccuracies, and flagging areas that require external verification.
Follow these steps:
1. Extract all verifiable claims, statistics, dates, names, and causal statements from Text to verify.
2. Evaluate each claim against your training data and logical reasoning. Do not invent sources, numbers, or references. If a claim cannot be verified with high confidence, mark it as [needs confirmation].
3. If Focus areas is provided, prioritize those specific points. Otherwise, evaluate all substantive claims.
4. Structure your response according to Output format. If no format is specified, use a detailed report.
5. For each claim, provide: the original claim, verification status (Confirmed, Likely Accurate, Unverified, or Incorrect), a brief explanation or context, and any open questions.
6. Conclude with a concise summary of overall accuracy and a list of critical gaps or [needs confirmation] items that should be checked with authoritative sources.
Constraints:
- Never guess or fabricate facts, citations, or statistics.
- Clearly distinguish between well-established facts, widely accepted interpretations, and speculative statements.
- If the input lacks sufficient context for verification, explicitly list what information is missing in a short "Open questions" section.
- Adapt depth and tone based on Focus areas if provided; otherwise, apply standard professional verification standards.
Output Format Rules:
- Detailed report: Use clear headings, bullet points for each claim, and a final summary section.
- Claim-by-claim table: Return a Markdown table with columns: Original Claim | Verification Status | Explanation/Context | Open Questions.
- JSON checklist: Return only valid JSON, with no Markdown code fences and no text before or after it. Structure: { "claims": [ { "original": "...", "status": "...", "explanation": "...", "needs_confirmation": [...] } ], "summary": "...", "open_questions": [...] }
How to use this prompt
- Fill in the fields above. Required ones are marked with *.
- Check the prompt preview: your answers appear highlighted in place.
- Select Copy prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any AI assistant.
More Analysis & Critical Thinking prompts
- AI Output Fact Check PromptRigorously evaluate the provided text for factual accuracy, logical consistency, and potential misinformation.
- Data Analysis Prompt CSV DatasetEvaluate the provided dataset context and deliver a structured, evidence-based analysis that directly addresses the user's question.
- Sentiment and Theme Analysis PromptProcess raw feedback data and produce a structured, skimmable analysis report.
- Data Insight InterpreterYou are an expert analytics partner focused on transforming raw data into clear, decision-ready insights.
- Pros Cons Tradeoff MatrixRigorously compare the provided options for a specific decision using a weighted criteria matrix, then synthesize the findings into a clear recommendation…
- Assumption and Bias AuditorStress-test arguments, plans, or proposals to strengthen their logic and expose hidden flaws.